Skip to content

Regulations Matrix - UN ECE Regulations

This document summarizes core UN regulations relevant to automotive E/E architecture, defining system boundary constraints and compliance requirements.


💡 Field Insight from Michael Lin

Background: UN R155/R156 Type Approval for an ADAS domain controller at a German OEM

Key Challenges:

  • First encounter with R155/R156 dual certification, no internal compliance process
  • Inconsistent supplier understanding of CSMS/SUMS, uneven documentation quality
  • No RXSWIN version management, making OTA traceability difficult

My Solution:

  1. Designed a CSMS-SUMS unified compliance framework to integrate both regulations into one process
  2. Authored a supplier compliance checklist to ensure Tier-2 deliverables meet Type Approval
  3. Built an RXSWIN version management system to link software versions with regulatory certification
  4. Organized cross-department regulation training across dev, test, and production

Quantified Results:

Metric Outcome
TÜV SÜD audit Passed on first attempt
First R155/R156 dual-certified product
Compliance document delivery cycle -40%
Supplier compliance pass rate 60% → 95%

Regulations Overview

Regulation Name Scope Key System Boundary Effective Date
UN R79 Steering equipment ADAS/Automated Driving Steering control authority In force
UN R152 AEBS Advanced Emergency Braking Active Safety Braking intervention boundary 2024+
UN R155 Cybersecurity Management All vehicle types CSMS governance boundary 2022+
UN R156 Software Update Management All vehicle types SUMS update boundary 2022+
UN R171 Camera Monitoring System CMS systems Visual perception boundary In force

UN R79 - Steering Equipment

Scope

Applicable to: Steering equipment of M and N category vehicles
Core goal: Ensure safety and controllability of steering systems

System Boundary Constraints

Constraint Category Requirement System Impact
ACSF Class A Driver-initiated assisted steering Driver confirmation required
ACSF Class B1 Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) Lateral acceleration ≤ 3 m/s²
ACSF Class B2 Emergency Steering Function (ESF) May override driver input
ACSF Class C Automated lane change Driver confirmation + monitoring
ACSF Class D High automation Full system control
ACSF Class E Remote-controlled driving External operator control

Key Technical Requirements

Item R79 Requirement Design Considerations
Fault response Single fault must not cause sudden unintended steering Redundancy required
Driver priority Driver can take over anytime for ACSF A–C Takeover request strategy
Speed limits ACSF B1 activates above 10 km/h Low-speed handling
Lateral acceleration ≤ 3 m/s² (normal), ≤ 5 m/s² (emergency) Control algorithm constraints

UN R152 - AEBS Advanced Emergency Braking System

Scope

Applicable to: M1 vehicles (passenger cars)
Core goal: Mitigate or avoid collisions

System Boundary Constraints

Scenario Target Minimum Performance
CCR (stationary vehicle) Stationary vehicle ahead Fully avoid when Vrel ≤ 60 km/h
CCRm (moving vehicle) Slow vehicle ahead Mitigate at relative speed ≤ 60 km/h
VRU-P (pedestrian) Crossing pedestrian Fully avoid at 20–60 km/h
VRU-B (cyclist) Crossing cyclist Fully avoid at 20–60 km/h

Functional Safety Boundaries

Boundary Type Constraint Suggested ASIL
False activation Extremely low false braking probability ASIL B+
Response time Brake within TTC thresholds Real-time constraints
Sensor availability Multi-sensor fusion tolerance Redundancy design

UN R155 - Cybersecurity Management System (CSMS)

Scope

Applicable to: All M and N category vehicles
Core goal: Establish cybersecurity management system

CSMS Management Boundary

flowchart TD subgraph CSMS["Cybersecurity Management System"] A[Risk Identification] --> B[Risk Assessment] B --> C[Risk Treatment] C --> D[Monitoring & Response] D --> A end subgraph Scope["Management Scope"] S1[Development Security] S2[Production Security] S3[Post-production Security] end CSMS --> Scope

System Boundary Constraints

Constraint Category Requirement Implementation Impact
Organizational capability Establish cybersecurity management process ISMS/TARA integration
Risk management Continuous identification and management Threat intelligence mechanisms
Design & development Security by Design principles SDLC security activities
Supply chain Supplier cybersecurity capability assessment Supplier audit process
Incident response Cybersecurity incident response capability SIRT team build-up
Update capability Secure update delivery Coordination with R156

Type Approval Requirements

Phase Certification Content Evidence
CSMS compliance Organization-level cybersecurity management CSMS certificate
Vehicle type approval Vehicle-specific cybersecurity measures Tech docs + test reports

UN R156 - Software Update Management System (SUMS)

Scope

Applicable to: M and N vehicles with OTA capability
Core goal: Ensure safe and effective software updates

SUMS Management Boundary

Boundary Type Management Content Implementation Requirement
Update identification Software version management (RXSWIN) Traceable versioning
Update validation Integrity and authenticity of update packages Signature verification
Rollback capability Recovery after update failure Dual partition / safe rollback
User notification Pre- and post-update notice HMI interaction design
Safety updates Control of safety-related updates Functional safety impact analysis

RXSWIN Software Identification

RXSWIN = Rx Software Identification Number
Purpose: Uniquely identify software versions affecting type approval
RXSWIN Component Description Example
Manufacturer code OEM identifier ABC
Vehicle line code Vehicle series X123
Software version Functional version V2.1.0
Checksum Integrity check A7B3

UN R171 - Camera Monitoring System (CMS)

Scope

Applicable to: Camera monitoring systems replacing traditional mirrors
Core goal: Ensure CMS provides equivalent or superior field of view

System Boundary Constraints

Constraint Category Requirement Technical Metrics
Field of view Equivalent to R46 mirror requirements Horizontal/vertical angles
Image quality Minimum resolution and contrast ≥ 100 pixels/°
Response time Display latency limit ≤ 200 ms
Brightness adaptation Adaptation to lighting conditions Dynamic range
Fault detection System fault warning Driver alert mechanism

Functional Safety Considerations

Failure Mode Impact Safety Measure
Camera failure Loss of view Redundant camera / mirror backup
Display failure Loss of information Fault warning + fallback
Image processing delay Perception lag Real-time monitoring

Regulation Interaction Matrix

flowchart LR subgraph FunctionalSafety["Functional Safety Domain"] R79[R79 Steering] R152[R152 AEBS] R171[R171 CMS] end subgraph Cybersecurity["Cybersecurity Domain"] R155[R155 CSMS] R156[R156 SUMS] end R155 <-->|Secure updates| R156 R79 -->|ADAS functions| R155 R152 -->|Active safety| R155 R171 -->|Perception system| R155 ISO26262[ISO 26262] -.->|Functional safety standard| FunctionalSafety ISO21434[ISO 21434] -.->|Cybersecurity standard| Cybersecurity

Compliance Checklist

Regulation Check Item Status
R79 ACSF classification confirmed
R79 Fault response strategy defined
R152 Scenario coverage analysis complete
R152 Performance test plan defined
R155 CSMS system established
R155 TARA analysis complete
R156 SUMS process defined
R156 RXSWIN scheme confirmed
R171 FOV equivalence validated
R171 Image quality test

Last updated: 2026-01-25

ML
Verified

Michael Lin

MAGNA Quality Manager
Architect of Compliance-Wächter
AI for ISO 21434 & UN R155

作为 MAGNA 质量经理,我在德国汽车电子行业深耕 10+ 年。每天我都见证着一个新的瓶颈: 网络安全合规 (UN R155 / ISO 21434)

我正在构建 Compliance-Wächter — 一个 AI 驱动的 Copilot, 自动化 TARA 分析,将合规文书工作减少 70%